In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
Looking for the information related to a house or building is more and more popular in several nations. There are some reasons why this is the case and homeowners can apply some methods to investigate their property.
In my view, one of the most common reasons for trend is that people have a curious about their home and its safety. It is clear that anyone decided to buy something that is really valuable especially a house, an estate or something like that, they always pay attention to the safety for their family. For instance, a over 50-year house was built mostly by timber in a tropical area, was probably ran down and not safe to live in. In addition, another reason could be the opportunity for investment. When a building has been experienced a various period in the past and still in good condition, it would have a historical value beside its physical value. Owing the property will be a chance to make money in the future.
In terms of methods to find out the background of a home, there are some ways that the owner can take to gain insights into this. Firstly, they can search information on the Internet about the construction permits, ownership details, specifications, and other relevant articles. This is a good start when the building was built in the urban areas with a plenty of public materials. Moreover, the houses in the outskirts or rural areas, the data like that is quite rare, so another way that very suitable is asking for elderly people who has lived in that zone for a long time. They are the person who witnessed all changes of the house and can provide important information related to this.
In conclusion, the number of people study the history of the house will certainly increase in the future and some useful information resources from Internet and senior people can help them in researching this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... safety for their family. For instance, a over 50-year house was built mostly by ...
^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
...timber in a tropical area, was probably ran down and not safe to live in. In additi...
^^^
Line 2, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a chance to make money in the future. In terms of methods to find out the back...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, really, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7298136646 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55800536721 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568322981366 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0105064604 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398085388052 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112950693833 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724946766933 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239208873698 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654509352967 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... safety for their family. For instance, a over 50-year house was built mostly by ...
^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
...timber in a tropical area, was probably ran down and not safe to live in. In additi...
^^^
Line 2, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a chance to make money in the future. In terms of methods to find out the back...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, really, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7298136646 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55800536721 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568322981366 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0105064604 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398085388052 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112950693833 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724946766933 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239208873698 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654509352967 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.