All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Consultants are the professionals who have profound knowledge about how companies operate and function. Through their experience they know what type of issues may be present in a company and how to efficiently tackle them. In view of this, companies usually hire an outside consultant to get their advice and opinion on certain matters regarding the well being of the company.
While hiring outside consultants may seem like an obvious solution to a problem that is being faced by the company and its employees, it may not always be the case. After all the consultant is an outsider and may not know the best about the situation at hand. The consultant produce some really appealing solutions moreover they are also going to be looking at their own monetary benefit by charging some hefty amount. In such a situation who will be a better person than the employees themselves to ask about the problems being faced by them. A company runs only because of its employees who work everyday to produce great outcomes for the company. A company is basically what it is due to its employees. So listening to the employees, taking regular surveys can certainly be a right way to go forward. But their voices should be heard and the surveys should be acted upon to see the real change. This improve the overall work environment and create healthy working conditions for the employees. And since the employees are the face of the company, the company's image also flourishes.
But certainly their may be certain situations where there is die need for a consultant to be hired and in those case the companies should not look back while doing so. These may be the cases where the company is struggling due to financial issues or due to some internal conflicts in the management or the employees are not satisfied with the company. In these cases hiring a consultant is a better choices to pull the company and its people out from this state. This is crucial and getting an outsiders advice and views would be essential. The consultant have their expertise in this field and know how to handle specific situations taking into regard all the factor concerned with it.
We say that when it comes to matters concerning the employees nothing can be better than listening and taking into account the opinions of the employees. But in larger cases hiring a consultant would be the right choice. So the company should be able to gauge the type of problem they are dealing with and only then come to a conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-23 | Hitman22 | 50 | view |
| 2024-11-23 | Hitman22 | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position describe specific circumstances in which adopting the r 16
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- Due to the physical differences in Man and Woman tasks are not equally suited for both 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'produces'.
Suggestion: produces
...t the situation at hand. The consultant produce some really appealing solutions moreove...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 598, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... only because of its employees who work everyday to produce great outcomes for the compa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'outsiders'' or 'outsider's'?
Suggestion: outsiders'; outsider's
...s state. This is crucial and getting an outsiders advice and views would be essential. Th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...when it comes to matters concerning the employees nothing can be better than listening an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, then, well, while, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77314814815 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57523954431 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467592592593 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.716016679 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1904761905 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323953102196 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110592900402 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457296610492 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226575687807 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040129823402 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.