Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendations and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development have been pivotal in development of many countries and enhancing the economic and welfarism of these countries, thereby, improving the standard of living of its citizens. Many nations are tending towards adoption of scientific research and development due to significance in nations development. The prompts recommend government to encourage scientific research and development. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the recommendation that scientific research and development should be supported wholly for three reasons.
First and foremost, the health industry has seen tremendous development due to immense scientific research and development. The discoveries of drugs and vaccines have been solely due to continuous ongoing scientific research which is possible because government didn’t place restriction on such activities. The use of Xray, chemotherapy, organ transplants, dialysis to mention a few are also made possible due to unrestricted scientific development. It is unfathomable how many lives would have lost if these scientific discoveries were unmade due hindrance by government.
Furthermore, technology plays a crucial role in the overall growth of a nation and is crucial in development of every other sectors like engineering, agriculture, transportation and communications. The advent of technology was due to innovative ideas that was made possible due to scientific research and development. Imagine, the number of miles people trekked in order to deliver mail or travel from one settlement to the other and how technology has eased these sufferings and made mail delivery faster and easier as well transportation. All these were possible because scientists were given free access to explore and be creative to solve major problems without numerous rules prohibiting them.
Perhaps, it might be argued that without rules, scientists are reliable to trespass and employ a lot of unethical approaches in their research activities. However, a lot of discipline has professional code of conducts and rules governing how research is to be conducted and the safety measures to be conducted which failure to comply will result in sanction. Hence, these professional bodies understand the intricate part of the discipline because they are also practitioners compared to government interference that might clouded with political and emotional sentiments, thereby, hindering major scientific development and breakthrough.
in conclusion, scientific development and research has been able to improve our lives positively with few restrictions. I believe continuous freedom for scientist to further research will be beneficial to all and enhance our livelihood more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe In an application for small business loans by a group of developers in the city of Monroe concluded that the jazz music club wil 33
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 70
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendations and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 75
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 66
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 57
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nd made mail delivery faster and easier as well transportation. All these were pos...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ientific development and breakthrough. in conclusion, scientific development and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8391959799 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29543662171 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525125628141 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1481997062 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.705882353 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220219951884 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081368127166 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645024376145 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131635376024 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678595171624 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.1639044944 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...nd made mail delivery faster and easier as well transportation. All these were pos...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ientific development and breakthrough. in conclusion, scientific development and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8391959799 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29543662171 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525125628141 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1481997062 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.705882353 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220219951884 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081368127166 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645024376145 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131635376024 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678595171624 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.1639044944 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.