People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
In recent years, increasingly sugar-based beverages are consumed by people. This phenomenon can be attributed to numerous reasons, consequently has negative effects on health. However, there are several strategies can be carried out to address this issue.
People consume sugar-based drinks due to its convenience and the influence of marketing. To commence with, with the convenience and availability, the sugary beverages can be easily accessible in vending machines, fast food restaurants, and convenience shops. Moreover, due to the busy pace of morden life, these drinks tend to become the quick and temping option for people looking for a convenient energy boost. Another reason which affects the increase in surgary drink consumption is the influcence of marketing. Some beverage companies make several attractive commercials, some endorsements by celebritis and target the young audiences. As a result, people, esspecially the youth, are dawn to these drinks, associating them with exciting and glamorous lifestyle.
To reduce sugary drink consumption, several strategies can be employed. Firstly, the government can impose stricter regulations on marketing and advertisements of sugar-based drinks, particularly younger and children. There can be more limitations in advertisements in media commonly assessed by the youth. Furthermore, more public health campaigns can be organized, which can make people have clearer understandings of the health risks related to these sugary beverages such as: obesity, diabete,...., consequently, promote a healthy lifestye among people.
In conclusion, the rise in sugary drink consumption is driven by factors such as marketing, convenience, and affordability. To mitigate this trend, governments, communities, and individuals must work together to limit marketing to young people, raise public awareness, and make healthier alternatives more accessible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The table data below shows the top ten Internet users by country in 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th the convenience and availability, the sugary beverages can be easily accessibl...
^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...gary beverages such as: obesity, diabete,...., consequently, promote a healthy lif...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01838235294 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28146985999 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2571813884 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371738844251 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119256462008 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831191592707 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205438724353 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075255115997 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.