In many countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. Some people think that the government should have the responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The government has the responsibility to build a fitting environment for children to thrive through means such as levying on unhealthy food. I believe parents are accountable for their children’s well-being as they are the ones who choose to have children.
The government has to provide parents with suitable conditions to raise their offspring. As the power is in the hands of the government, they could legislate laws that will encourage toddlers and adolescents to become more fit, such as charging more taxes on sugary foods and reducing levies for vegetables. Doing so makes it easier for parents to feed their newborns healthier food for a more affordable price, leading to an increase in physically strong children. For instance, Japanese people have a longer life expectancy as they have access to cheap healthy food from a young age.
However, parents have to take responsibility for raising their children to be healthy individuals. Although there are some accidental conceiving, most children are born from the decisions of their parents. Therefore, it’s only logical to have the parents bear the financial burden that comes from subsidizing a child. Otherwise, some parents would neglect their infants and leave them to the government, putting pressure on the economy. In fact, many countries have stated that parents are accountable for their children to prevent this situation.
In conclusion, although the government has to enact laws that facilitate raising a child. I think It’s still on the parents to look after their children as it was their choice to have children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Bigk016 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | khlytran | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- More people today put their personal and private information online address telephone number credit card number to do everyday activities such as banking shopping and socializing Is this a positive or negative development 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices 67
- Children today find it difficult to concentrate on or to pay attention to school What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84667528341 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2832562699 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194158485493 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785617873147 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428919646076 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132694061935 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266551963409 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84667528341 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2832562699 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194158485493 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785617873147 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428919646076 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132694061935 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266551963409 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.