The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of weekly income spent on different categories by families in a specific nation in 1968 and 2018. Overall, the majority of families’ salaries was for purchasing food while Fuel and power had the least invested money.

Having looked at the bar chart for more details, it is clear that the percentage of wage spent on food was the highest, which was higher than the figures for housing, clothing and footware, and leisure combined, representing 35 percent in 1968. The amount of money that families allocated to transport, personal goods, and household goods shared the same pattern, taking up just under 10 percent each.

in the year 2018. the figure for food experienced a dramatic decrease of nearly half the initial data. The percentage of households budgets spent on leisure became the highest category, holding over 20 percent. Ranking third was housing, its proportion increased to nearly double compared with its figure in 1968. Notably, the money that was using for household goods remained the same for over half century, stagnating at under 10 percent. The proportion for fuel and power, clothing and footware, and personal goods accounted for the least, making up under 5 percent each.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...aking up just under 10 percent each. in the year 2018. the figure for food expe...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...r 10 percent each. in the year 2018. the figure for food experienced a dramatic ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, third, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16831683168 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5838928584 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3669016958 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926990400262 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483892943337 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629099018868 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855549000038 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556003456055 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.