The use of social media is replacing face-to-face contact with many people. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In digital era, more and more direct contact with other people are superseded by using social network. Partially, I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points, which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph.
One the one side, those who oppose to online communication opine that social interaction embodied with physical contact has changed since the presence of technological sophistication. This not only decreases stronger bonds with close relatives but also eliminates interaction quality in social surrounding to be more isolated. Consequently, poor mental illness dissociative disorder might be experienced by people who hardly manage the sense of social human beings. Furthermore, in working field, miss-communication among team partners seems to be inevitable aspect of internet-based communication. It is evident that in-situ survey should be conducted to share ongoing projects to hinder the different arguments, even worse the failure of business profit.
On the other side, those who propose this perspective highlight that using social platform, particularly Research and Development sector, generates the good communication among researchers progressively. For instance, to provide the real-time data collection between them, who are being in distance, could utilize Trello offering features such as a simple cars-and-list format to share scientists’ Innovative development. Furthermore, such communication media support the business sector as online marketing strategy. Start-up companies allocate others advertising budget to promote and expand their product marketplace. Indonesian cosmetic brand, Wardah, has used this technique to acquaint the youth marketing, ultimately acquire top-selling rank according to databoks.katadata.co.id in 2022.
Overall, it seems to me that using social media to replace direct communication among society are worth implementing because of the positive impacts including to help scientists in geographic separation and support effective advertising purposes. This is as long as society keeps integrating sense of social beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-06 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | ojehparvaz | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | phuc.phan160902 | 73 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theatre in 2010 and 2012 73
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some argue that music mainly serves as a way for individuals to reduce their stress and anxiety To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development however others think social value is lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe people cannot solve environmental problems whereas others believe individuals are responsible for solving environmental problems Discuss both views and give your own 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lated. Consequently, poor mental illness dissociative disorder might be experien...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or mental illness dissociative disorder might be experienced by people who hardl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16326530612 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40347553292 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659863945578 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4070969041 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153772640361 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498840649905 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532958040625 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999098262475 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321492952216 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lated. Consequently, poor mental illness dissociative disorder might be experien...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or mental illness dissociative disorder might be experienced by people who hardl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16326530612 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40347553292 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659863945578 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4070969041 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153772640361 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498840649905 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532958040625 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999098262475 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321492952216 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.