Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
That many health issues are believed to be a consequence of consuming a considerable amount of sweetened foods leads to the question of whether to raise their cost. Although some would say the responsibility for health problems is the choice of consumers, I believe raising the cost of this type of food would discourage people from consuming more sugar.
Opponents of lifting the price of sugary foods would say that it is not the groceries themselves but because of the consumer’s preference of diet that detrimentally affects their health. As reportedly, there is a large majority of people that neglect their health and may not pay attention to the foods they have, which gradually exacerbates their health condition. Diets with high levels of glucose, however, can indeed lead to obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Researchers also conclude that over 50% of obesity’s causes is the high consumption of sugar and they state that if people have lower amounts of sweeteners, their health will progressively enhance.
Therefore, advocates of this approach would espouse that raising the cost of sweetened foods and beverages efficiently discourages people from purchasing these groceries. As the prices elevate, people may opt for other alternative products and thereby consume lower glucose goods. If governments levy high taxes on beverages, for example, people will thoroughly consider whether to spend more money on them. As a result, they would instead prefer to buy other drinks at a more reasonable price, helping them lower their consumption of high-sugar products.
In conclusion, the portion of sugar consumption is paramount to the possibility of health problems. I strongly agree that people may purchase healthier products when raising the cost of sugary ones is implemented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enrol in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...able amount of sweetened foods leads to the question of whether to raise their cost. Although some woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40925266904 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95292618474 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580071174377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0010609412 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280074904928 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100339366432 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333980691039 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171155738449 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178321131056 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.