Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals argue that town and city councils should attach greater importance on tree-planting campaigns in open areas than constructing accommodations for city dwellers. From my point of view, although increasing green area is of great significance, the urban planners should give their top priority to building more facilities for the locals in order to reach higher living standard.
On the one hand, local authority should place higher value on expanding the area of greenery for various justifications, chief of which is that trees can purify the contaminated air in urbanized regions. From a scientific perspective, the excessive number of vehicles in operations in metropolitan areas is notorious for its low level of air purity. Therefore, this trend is a trigger for the reduction in living satisfaction as well as the detrimental effects on human well-being. If more trees are planted in urban areas, the leaves might act as a dust shield and allows city residents to breathe in more purified atmosphere, hence better physical and mental health. However, air pollution is not the only urban hurdle which needs addressing promptly as there are more serious problems that can not be offset by plantation in towns and cities.
On the other hand, I firmly approve of the opinion thar the state should place a higher value on constructing new buildings for dwellers than increasing green areas. That is because both approaches are aimed to enhance the physical and mental well-being of the citizens, yet the provision of accommodations is more urgent and fundamental; moreover, there are several effective solutions for the fresher air in cities. The explanation is that the urban population is rising at a breakneck pace. If the local policy-makers do not take actions to improve quality of housing, part of city dwellers could live in overcrowded conditions, which leads to the substandard of living and deleterious impacts on general well-being. As a matter of fact, more open areas are devoted to the construction of new housing is synonymous with the drop of trees in public places, and this results in the degradation of air quality to some extent. Nevertheless, the local people can reverse the environmental decline by taking measures themselves such as installing air filters at work and at home. These actions would help city dwellers minimize the bad effects of air pollution to certain degree.
To sum up, despite some convincing reasons behind the idea of covering open spaces in urban areas with plants, I wholeheartedly believe that it is more advisable to place a greater emphasis on the construction of more accommodations for people living in towns and cities.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation such as cost reduction and environment conservation Discuss both views and give your opi 73
- There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem 73
- Some people feel that governments should take a large proportion of people s salaries to pay for necessary public services such as roads and schools Others feel that high taxes are a bad thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19540229885 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99860891692 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6460604069 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24701554763 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783202402849 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801280973997 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168657326184 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396772491908 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19540229885 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99860891692 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6460604069 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24701554763 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783202402849 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801280973997 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168657326184 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396772491908 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.