Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, various types of entertainment have become more and more popularly in the community, particually gen Z. It has been argued that some people express their discontentment when celebrities earn more money than politicians. Actually, there are many reasons for that and I think this is a positive development for the society as well as the countries.
Numerous factors affect and result in having richer celenbrities than politicians, but a main cause is the significantly growth of the entertainment industry. It means that people spend more their time, money and take much their attention on types of entertainment such as music, film and drama. It is easy to understand when people are easier to get mental problems after a long day in stressful working or studying, peaceful songs or humorous movies is the best treaments to relax and rest. Moreover, officials and authorities also pay money to use entertainment services so desire their entertainment need.
This appreciate development of celebrities is positive when showcasing signs in indrectly good tendency of the society. Firstly, the social situation is better when citizens can be free to desire the highest need, mental. Secondly, this will prompt the development of business and commercial activities. Thirdly, this is also a way to help countries and authorities to transfer the culture and messages to their citizens as well as international ones easlier.
In conclusion, potiticians are the essential person and celebrities are paid more is the pot
- Governments should support care and finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households owning four types of electronic devices between 1995 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Governments should support care and finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The way people live has changed significantly Some say that it is a negative trend Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35684647303 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11286849094 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605809128631 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.425683595 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272996323427 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095816280186 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859036636455 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168292453329 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117607267501 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.