The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who eat fast food in restaurants in six distinct groups in the United States from 2003 and 2013.
In general, the people who went to restaurants to eat fast food once a week and once or twice a week have higher frequency among all other groups, while those eating fast food in restaurants daily and never have the smallest proportion in the United States between 2003 and 2013.
As can be seen, people who eat fast food once a week had the largest frequency in both 2003 and 2006 around 31 and 33 percent, and after that decreased to about 27 percent in 2013. Those used restaurants once or twice a month first dropped from 30 percent to 25 percent between 2003 and 2006. After that increased more than 33 percent in 2013 which was the largest category this year. The percentage of the group ‘several times a week’ fluctuated varied 16 percent and 20 percent in all these years. The proportion of people who eat fast food a few times a year increased approximately from 13 percent to 15 percent over the period. The two remaining groups include those who daily use restaurants and never eat fast food in restaurants each category no more than 5 percent of people.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt to 25 percent between 2003 and 2006. After that increased more than 33 percent in ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... percent to 15 percent over the period. The two remaining groups include those who ...
^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a daily'.
Suggestion: who is a daily
... The two remaining groups include those who daily use restaurants and never eat fast food...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60091743119 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46722903057 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477064220183 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6475925819 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183623953775 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976955825998 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065090169897 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167813025361 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386343139753 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt to 25 percent between 2003 and 2006. After that increased more than 33 percent in ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... percent to 15 percent over the period. The two remaining groups include those who ...
^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a daily'.
Suggestion: who is a daily
... The two remaining groups include those who daily use restaurants and never eat fast food...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60091743119 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46722903057 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477064220183 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6475925819 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183623953775 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976955825998 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065090169897 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167813025361 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386343139753 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.