Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Sugar is evidenced to be detrimental to individuals’ health, and medical professionals frequently advise against excessive consumption of high-sugar products. It is suggested that an increase in the price of such products could deincentitize people, leading to less sugar in their diets. While I agree with the health consequences of sugar, I am against the notion that price manipulation would reduce people’s tendency toward sugar.
First, foods and drinks with artificial sugar are among the most advertised products in media. The manufacturing companies dedicate a substantial amount of money to branding and leverage various marketing techniques, such as the use of bright colors and child-friendly content, to make their products appear delightful, enticing, and appealing. As a result, these companies may retain the ability to tempt the individuals, despire a surge in price. Additionally, the main target audience of sugary products are often children, which may be easier to attract via ads while not being as price-sensitive as adults.
Effectiveness of increasing the costs associated with these products is further undermined by individuals’ potential biological dependence on artificial sugar. To be specific, this type of sugar has been incorporated into people’s diets since the industrial revolution and some people may have developed a form of addiction toward this ingredient. Relatedly, numerous studies have provided evidence that sugar is indeed addictive. Therefore, people’s cravings may persist, leading them to consume sweets regardless of the price.
Concluding from these remarks, I do not agree that price manipulation would bring about any significant change in individuals’ habits regarding sugar. A more effective strategy may be to discourage companies from pushing sugary products via extensive marketing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and incl 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 84
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84926470588 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24596960298 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1625560962 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.384615385 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264754678032 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932816093793 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455744479592 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160391419203 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336015439102 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.