The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 (4 age groups). Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the share of people in each age group who went to the movies at least once a month from 1984 to 2003. Overall, all age groups showed similar trends throughout the period, starting with an initial decline over the first 10 years, followed by an increase in intensity over the next 10 years, after which most groups decline slightly again over the next 10-year period.
In the first year, the youngest group (14-24) has the highest grade attainment rate, at 92%, In the following two decades, this ratio did not change significantly but only increased and decreased continuously. Ages 25-34 Reflect this trend, starting at 80% in 1978 and then declined sharply over the next 10 years and began to recover in the following years
By contrast, 60% of people aged 35-49 went to the cinema at least once a month in 1978. This figure then dropped in 1988, before rising again in 1998. A similar upward trend was found among people over 50, with figures starting at 40% and falling to the low 30% range a decade later, followed by a significant increase and end at 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | bassmodulators123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 67
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 89
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.703125 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32470852974 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0506347427 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118342395542 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636073718147 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686772092691 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808425164243 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481041378197 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.