Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
In a current fast paced society, prosperity in the field of art is crucial. Thus, it is worth a debate whether a nation should provide funding to the people who are in art field. Although having a support from a country could be beneficial at some point, I agree with the statement that the integrity of art can be hasted if government funding is provided.
First, providing a financial support to artists can influence artists in loosing their creativity. For instance, if a government provides fundings to certain artists, it would request certain conditions that are needed to be fulfilled from artists, such as certain amount of artworks. As a result, artists would be forced to produce certain amount of artworks in a limited period, and artworks that are made in such conditions would not be the same quality as artworks that are created only by their free will. Thus, it will result in an adverse impact on the wholeness of art.
Second, funding in a field of art can produce disparity in artists. For example, In reality, when a nation provides financial supports to artists, not all people can receive fundings. The incidents that some people would get financial support and some people would not is inevitable. For those people who were not able to receive funding would be discouraged to be actively participate in lots of artworks. Thus, having unequal provision of fundings might generate discouragement to people in the field, leading to disintegrate in art.
In summary, even though funding could be helpful in some situations, it could discourage people from being motivated, and crack integrity in the process of creation. It would be better not to provide anything than to haste the integrity of such a small society as art. People should be provided the equally, without any disparity.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96699669967 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72087342528 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481848184818 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1944441175 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338411597139 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131692350152 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680106118784 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237414478535 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912733478938 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.