school uniform
Wearing school uniforms from primary school to high school is a norm in various countries. Although students are recommended following this convention, it is a topic of debate whether wearing uniforms should be compulsory or not. In my opinion, designating and standardizing students’ wardrobe has multiple advantages.
On the one hand, one of the most significant benefits from uniform is that it eliminates economic inequalities between students and reducing the competition among students for showing off stylish clothes. In contrast, if the students are allowed to wear free-style clothes, they will be likely to strive up to keep up with fashion trend, which will thus cause distractions in studying. Therefore, wearing uniforms is a solution to promote the idea that students should be recognized based on their academic performance rather than economic status. Moreover, uniforms not only make students who come from low-income families feel less isolated or inferior to others but also prevent those from high-income families from being the target of bullies as all students look as plain as their peers.
In addition, uniforms are believed to have positive effects on discipline. For instance, when children are required not to wear make-up or jewelry, and wear uniforms instead, they are conforming to a dress code, which in turn conjures up thoughts of safety and order. As a result, they take school works more seriously by not wearing obscene, gang-related clothes, and improving attendance, which solves numerous discipline problems.
Nonetheless, there are critics, who view school uniform as a symbol of restrictive culture, and a determinant of children’s self-expression, which potentially suppresses student’s individuality. However, this argument is groundless since uniforms are varied due to different seasons and students are free to wear whatever they like after school. Thus, the impact of school uniforms on children’s individuality is extremely limited.
To sum up, from my point of view, wearing school uniforms should be retained as a rule not only because it unifies the rich and the poor, but also instills a sense of discipline. Additionally, the concern that uniforms will suppress individuality is groundless.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59710144928 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1573986352 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585507246377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2856921784 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386923972961 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164514563572 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144194243983 0.0667982634062 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271453108287 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114784626265 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.