Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt juxtaposes two relative characteristics that a leader must possess. On one hand where moral judgement is an important aspect to discern the right from the wrong, of considerable importance is also that a leader is able to maintain his stance amongst his peers. A leader however should never compromise on his moral ability just for the sake of maintaining his venerance among the people who follow him.
A leader is, born from the crowds and is thought to represent the ideology of the crowds that choose them. It is only germane that the leader puts the quality that caused him to be elected or chosen - his judgement at the forefront. For example, Mahatma Gandhi, who was the forerunner in India's struggle for freedom was hugely respected because of his ideologies and moral judgement. His ideologies of non-violence and peace were what made him known over the globe. Thus, it is only makes it apt for a leader to not compensate on the ideals and thoughts that predicated towards his being elected as a leader.
The long-term goal of leading their devotees towards their consummate goal of freedom, wishes or a revolt, for that matter, should be the ideal belief of a leader. An ideal leader should be able to take a jab to his respect, if for an imminent decision, but if the decision works out for the higher interests and eventually leads to the desired outcome then such an act leads to a greater respect amongst his peers. A CEO of a company might take an unorthodox route to save his floundering company, which might be scorned upon by his peers, but if in eventuality the decision benefits the company it would command greater respects by his subordinates. Therefore, it is righteous for a leader to have a quality to make a moral judgement, more than worrying about maintaining the respect of their colleagues.
A valid point that acts in favor of the statement, would be that a leader might overlook the morality of a judgement in some cases to maintain his position among his followers. This is appropriate in some cases where a support from the masses is more important than the implications of the actions on part of the leader. Thus, a leader may sometimes concede to his moral judgement to maintain his position.
As a conclusion, it can be seen that a leader is elected because of his ability to make a sound judgement and he should keep the benefit of his followers at the top priority which make moral judgement a more important characteristic than maintaining respect among peers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78669724771 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74560637976 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465596330275 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3731984191 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4375 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296911636802 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113432517786 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610485339984 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198500948255 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522249703459 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.