Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Respect is something that everyone works to achieve. If an individual is not given respect in his own workplace, he/she will not work effectively and responsibly, leaving the project's task prosaic. Sound moral judgement should be an important characteristic for any effective leader.
Leaders, when they take everyone together, are able to achieve the intended results efficiently with things not messing up. Messing up the things means that the team remains cohesive at every stage. With the leader lacking moral judments, may fall the team apart, with team no longer working with him/her and could ruin a project. A leader, with moral judgements, already knows how to talk with his fellow teammates and can easily get the works done, with everyone enjoying every stage of the project without being insulted.
Everyone has his/her own way in which he/she can easily get persuaded. A leader must know the way. The ways could be emotional, patriotic or any other way. Being rude at the fellow teammates and demeaning them could simply leave them demotivated and could result them leaving the team and making the project abysmal.
However, there could be situation when a teammate is just being lazy and making others leave interest in the project. This demands for leader, leaving the moral judgements and taking strict actions against that fellow.
A leader with strong moral judgement can get the work done better without demeaning the teammates and leaving them fall apart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 37
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...h things not messing up. Messing up the things means that the team remains cohesive at...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 240.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43903441732 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570833333333 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5370746728 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1428571429 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152364503872 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654628057809 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785317525575 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973645701337 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797872143075 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.