The best way to prepare people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competitionWrite a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In develo

Essay topics:

The best way to prepare people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Cooperation is a necessary skill in today's world. We require cooperation to maintain a fair and just environment. With only competition and an "everyone for themselves attitude", humankind would not be where it is today. Though some may argue against the value of cooperation, this author will try to address the main challenges against it and support the necessity of a cooperative environment.

Critics may challenge the belief that cooperation prepares young people for industry by directing one's attention to free trade and the competitive markets. In this model, competition is what gives momentum to industries and companies. It is what motivates competitors to out-perform eachother and provide the best prices. However, gone unchecked, these markets have shown time and time again that a world with only competition leaves room solely for those full of greed and corruption to cheat their way to unfairly earned fortunes. Wall Street and the 2008 crisis are a perfect demonstration of this corruption. Through cooperation, regulatory bodies and countries are able to keep the markets competitive while all agreeing on a set of rules that will keep the competition fair.

Moreover, these same critics may also claim that cooperation leads to complacency in those people who see no advantage for themselves. For example, the communist movement supported the creation of a government built on cooperation where contributions of the individual were brought together and redistributed to the group. In its early days, the government of China became a communist nation with this concept in mind. Without motivation from competition to exceed quotas, farmers felt no incentives to contribute beyond what is necessary. On the other hand, China today seems to have found a balance between competition and cooperation becoming one of the largest global economies of our time. This argument makes a fair point that competition is a great motivator yet also shows how cooperation played a big role in the phenomenal rise of the Chinese economy.

It has been shown that though competition is ever present in our modern world, cooperation is also a necessary presence. Competition can be a great motivator but can also open the door to more selfish ideals. Yet a dearth in competition can lead to complacency in a population. We must then conclude that cooperation, with support from a competitive environment, will yield the best results.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 DH123 50 view
2020-01-18 YO 50 view
2020-01-17 ali.rs 50 view
2020-01-06 Sumaiya Mila 62 view
2020-01-06 Shams Tarek 62 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user amveille :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, then, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 37.0 12.9106741573 287% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36855670103 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11385753991 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564432989691 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5864048786 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884392031166 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270103099654 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287381879721 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554906536505 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268661817355 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.