CLAIM: WE USUALLY LEARN MUCH MORE FROM PEOPLE WHOSE VIEWS WE SHARE THAN THOSE WHOSE VIEWS CONTRADICT OUR OWN.
REASON: DISAGREEMENT CAN CAUSE STRESS AND INHIBIT LEARNING.
The human world comprises of several billions of personalities living together and each one of them consisting something that the other wants to assimilate. At the same time, the sense of compatibility is something that a person wants to feel with others. So the extent of this compatibility especially in terms of views might influence the learning process. This assertion is true to a large extent.
Two persons completely unknown to each other begin to know each other better when they start sharing their views on various aspects of the world. As per the most general attributes of human nature, we get easily fond of people whose views are similar to ours. Immediately, a kind of attachment is felt with those persons and we find them to be superior to those who conflict our views. Consequently if we find that such people have a certain feature or knowledge about something that is worth learning, we find it easy to do so.
According to Hindu mythology, the most prominent pair of a teacher and a student was that of Chanakya and Chandragupta Maurya. The student Chandragupta was a true disciple of his teacher and learnt about each and every aspect of life. He was taught about various strategies for war, leadership and wisdom. From such stories it is apparent that both of them shared similar views towards their life. Even today they both are considered to be the most appropriate examples of critical thinkers. The philosophies and startegies of Chanakya are widely followed. In some of the movies depicting these historical classics, it is clearly portrayed how Chandragupta was influenced by his teachers aberrant thinking and his views that are completely different from others. This influence made it easy for him to cope up even with the extremely exacting nature of hi teacher.
Though the stated assertion about sharing of views in the learning process is true to a large extent, there are certain scenarios in which these factors do not influence the teaching learning process. For example, if Sachin Tendulkar has seriously conflicting views with his coach, had it been possible that he did not turn out to be such an exceptional player ? Well, probably not. Regardless of the views that they shared, it is the quality of knowledge about the game that the coach possessed and his teaching methodology were the things that helped Sachin in his career. Therefore in spite of sharing completely dissimilar views with someone, we find their knowledge to be so exceptional that we hardly regard the disagreement caused on certain topics.
In conclusion, the above stated assertion is not completely true and not applicable to each and every aspects of human life. Of course as per the basic nature of human beings, compatibility of views plays a major role in learning from someone, sometimes it might be the case that the knowledge that has to be gained is so worthy, that such factors are neglected. Thus this statement is true in both is aspects and uniquely applicable to varying situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-21 | sohamjoshi92 | 62 | view |
| 2015-06-25 | Hinson | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many 83
- PEOPLE’S BEHAVIOR IS LARGELY DEFINED BY FORCES NOT OF THEIR OWN MAKING 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or any other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
- CLAIM: WE USUALLY LEARN MUCH MORE FROM PEOPLE WHOSE VIEWS WE SHARE THAN THOSE WHOSE VIEWS CONTRADICT OUR OWN.REASON: DISAGREEMENT CAN CAUSE STRESS AND INHIBIT LEARNING. 62
- TRUE SUCCESS CAN BE MEASURED PRIMARILY IN TERMS OF GOALS ONE SETS FOR ONESELF. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
The human world comprises of several billions of personalities livin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...perior to those who conflict our views. Consequently if we find that such people have a cert...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ies of Chanakya are widely followed. In some of the movies depicting these historical class...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... do not influence the teaching learning process. For example, if Sachin Tendulkar has s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 576, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hings that helped Sachin in his career. Therefore in spite of sharing completely dissimil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...orthy, that such factors are neglected. Thus this statement is true in both is aspec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, of course, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98023715415 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7502383153 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47233201581 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2588210257 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199739820432 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505174421576 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620693682949 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109018867839 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795056775115 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.