TRUE SUCCESS CAN BE MEASURED PRIMARILY IN TERMS OF GOALS ONE SETS FOR ONESELF.
The presented issue relates the success that can be attributed to a person with the goals that he/she has achieved. This assertion is valid in many aspects. The success that one has achieved is primarily evident from the goals that were set especially when they are examined from a view point of a person who has not witnessed the efforts of the person in discussion.
Firstly, success can be defined as to the what extend the person gets satisfied on achievement of the goals. It might be the case that only achieving the goal partially might satiate the person. On the other hand, a person who is avaricious for success, might not be contented even if he has achieved nearly ninety-nine percent of the goals that he/she has set. Such persons constantly strive to achieve more and more whereas the complacent ones are the exact opposites of them. Both of these types of people deal with the fight for success in a drastically different manner but, at the end what matters to them for evaluating their success, are the goals that are concerned. The third person examining their success also looks upon the same aspects.
Secondly, when the person whose success is being measured is totally unfamiliar to the observer, his satisfaction in terms goals remains an untouched factor. In such a case only statistical evidence is considered as parameter to measure success. Here both the greedy ones and the ones who are easily satisfied are uniformly judged. Their commitments, efforts, persistence or the zeal with which they are striving towards their goals are totally left unexamined. For example, the students who prepare for the entrance examinations such as for the IITs, are solely judged upon the scores that they secure. If a person who studied for nearly eight to ten hours a day falls behind in scores to the person who has secured his/her grades just by fate or through some unfair means, then the authorities would definitely consider the latter one regardless of the reasons behind the success.
Definitely, there are certain other factors that lead a person to success. The influence of these factors in one’s success cannot be overlooked. They form the base for the mountain which takes one to the summit of success. Such factors can be the hardships that one faces, his/her strengths, the opportunities that one grabs and the commitments to the efforts. But in reality these are only known to the person himself or other people who have remained witnesses to the efforts that one has put upon. For the rest of the world, that person is just like everyone else; the results solely determine his/her success.
All in all the word SUCCESS has a varied notion in each and everyone’s mind. But it is not possible for a person to be fit for each and every of those prospects in order to be termed as successful. The goals that one achieves, no matter to what extent, are the only evident factors on the basis of which success can be attributed to a person. Rest all remains unexamined just as a group of bushes in a vast desert.
- TRUE SUCCESS CAN BE MEASURED PRIMARILY IN TERMS OF GOALS ONE SETS FOR ONESELF. 54
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 29
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many 83
- PEOPLE’S BEHAVIOR IS LARGELY DEFINED BY FORCES NOT OF THEIR OWN MAKING 50
- CLAIM: WE USUALLY LEARN MUCH MORE FROM PEOPLE WHOSE VIEWS WE SHARE THAN THOSE WHOSE VIEWS CONTRADICT OUR OWN.REASON: DISAGREEMENT CAN CAUSE STRESS AND INHIBIT LEARNING. 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, whereas, as for, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2533.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81558935361 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56766135196 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463878326996 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5246581745 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.32 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.04 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375416368816 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112098395657 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671116924755 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235319302147 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00744134079302 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.