Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments are responsible for both providing for today’s citizens and paving the way for future generations to come. They should not be parochially focused on solving immediate problems if that comes at the expense of any future planning. Such short-sightedness could exacerbate problems we are experiencing today, and create dilemmas that we would be ill-prepared to handle down the road.
Many of the major problems that governments face today are expected to worsen exponentially over the next fifty years. For example, climate change, which has been ignored for decades since it is a “silent killer,” requires immediate action now in order to prevent irreparable global damage that is anticipated in the future. It is imperative that governments focus money and resources on finding efficient and viable alternative energy sources. These future solutions will help to prevent global calamity and will ensure economies of the future avoid the precipitous position we are in today.
Similarly, the global population is expected to exceed the capacity of current food production in only a matter of decades. Governments should unequivocally be focused on developing alternative food sources -- like insect-based products -- and re-appropriating arable land that is currently used for cattle production and corn to grow sustainable crops.
With regards to U.S. social services, the public school system is becoming increasingly overpopulated, to the point where teachers are incapable of addressing each student’s needs and ensuring they receive a proper education. Schools that are underfunded today contribute to a phenomenon referred to as the “school to prison pipeline.” Under this theory, students that receive sub-par education in underfunded schools are significantly more likely to end up in prison than their counterparts from well-funded schools. The solution to this systematic problem cannot come overnight; governments need to reinvest in schools and social services like affordable housing today in order to reap benefits down the line when today’s students graduate and enter the working world.
It may be true that some of the anticipated problems of the future never actually materialize. Solutions to problems that are very abstract should not be granted as much funding or resources by the government. Matters under this umbrella would be things like artificial intelligence takeover or colonizing Mars. Governments would be better off focusing on acute dysfunctions than trying to tackle those abstract issues. At the end of the day, a healthy balance between dealing with current issues and planning for future ones is the correct approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 86
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 70
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 70
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 83
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Governments are responsible for both pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e working world. It may be true that some of the anticipated problems of the future neve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, similarly, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6157635468 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0697382175 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593596059113 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5828056292 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.117647059 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227308004993 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704092265656 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518599318579 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11702474926 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567883018601 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.