Issue Task Prompt:
Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Science and technology have continuously helped us solve complex technology problems in the field of transport, communication, medical care and social interaction. We have constantly pushed the boundaries of long distance communication through telephones. The medical care technology has developed to the point of automated robotic surgeries. Also, people interact with each other remotely with devices in the palm of their hands. All these problems which were unsolved are solved today thorugh science and technology.
Hence, it is inevitable that advancement of science and technology will solve all of society's problems.
Steadily, science has solved problems we faced in the earlier times, which includes long distance transportation to communication. Wheels were invented to reduce the barrier of transportation and movement. This solved problems around logistics, movement of goods which led to exploration and freedom of movement. We also faced with problem of communicating messages from sender to reciever. This would take long hours by any existing physical mode of transportation. Recognising this, science used air and light-based waves to communicate messages from any sender to reciever across the globe in the speed of light. Thus, science has helped to solve long distance communication and transportation using wheels and phones.
People wanted to share information, learn and interact with each other. The internet and social media have provided a perfect virtual platform for interacting and learning from each other. Important news, learning material from academic leaders and social platform for casual interaction have been provided by Google, Youtube and Facebook. The advancement of technology is what led to quick dissemination of information to all corners of the globe.
Problems related to maintaining emotional wellbeing of humans are still unsolved. These problems are not yet solved by science and technology. Since the human brain is so complex, there is a question as to whether science can completely understand and solve such problems in the entirety. But, advancements in the fields of Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence are promising and present exciting opportunities ahead for uncovering methods to understand emotional and mental wellbeing.
Hence, science technology has solved problems ranging from transportation, communication, information sharing. Thus, their continued advancement would solve all of society’s problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 201, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...rain is so complex, there is a question as to whether science can completely understand and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 366, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...euroscience and Artificial Intelligence are promising and present exciting opportunities ahea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, thus, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 12.9106741573 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89473684211 5.05705443957 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1590705883 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531855955679 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2530337541 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5217391304 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6956521739 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17391304348 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256200641416 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848481429666 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902551197146 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1763043371 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1012647192 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.1639044944 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 201, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...rain is so complex, there is a question as to whether science can completely understand and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 366, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...euroscience and Artificial Intelligence are promising and present exciting opportunities ahea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, thus, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 12.9106741573 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89473684211 5.05705443957 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1590705883 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531855955679 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2530337541 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5217391304 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6956521739 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17391304348 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256200641416 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848481429666 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902551197146 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1763043371 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1012647192 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.1639044944 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.