National Curriculum
With the increasing number of students pursuing higher education in the past decade, there has likewise been an increase in the discussion of how to best prepare students to successfuly tackle the rigorous college curriculum. Although the prompt suggests that a nation should require all of its students to adhere to the identical national curriculum prior to their entry into college, I disagree with this recommendation for two reasons.
First, students are unique individuals with a myriad of interests and often explore their diverse interests through the various elective courses offered at their schools. The implementation of a standardized national curriculum would inevitably lead to the loss of choice between an array of electives and would stifle the ability of students to explore their interests through their choice of coursework. Moreover, as these elective courses often play an integral role in a student's determination of his or her future career, a standardized curriculum would also limit a student's abilities to explore his or her aptitude for various career options.
Although a standardized curriculum may ensure that all students adequately complete the required coursework that will prepare them for their college courses, it will also reduce the diversity of thought processes that form as a result of the applications of knowledge gained from distinct courses. In a rapidly globalizing world where the importance of diversity on college campuses and workspaces has been placed center-stage, the implementation of a standardized curriculum would reduce the possibility for students to encounter the varied opinions of other students who have had their ideas shaped through the exploration of a unique combination of coursework. Thus, the use of a standardized curriculum would only expose students to a predetermined set of coursework and limit the potential for students to make unique connections between the courses they have chosen to take.
In essence, as students are unique in their interests the use of a standardized curriculum will limit their ability to select the courses that would best allow them to explore their passions and future career choices, as well as reduce their exposure to the individuality of thought processes that occur as a result of applying knowledge from different courses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Marqueetim | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 73
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 60
- National Curriculum 50
- Late night news 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ourses often play an integral role in a students determination of his or her future care...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, thus, well, of course, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48066298343 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05080451664 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466850828729 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 23.0359550562 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1983808111 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 220.444444444 118.986275619 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.2222222222 23.4991977007 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.21951772744 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193861062606 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10166884452 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849893081011 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137398485263 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770277158908 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.5 14.1392134831 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.42 48.8420337079 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 12.1743820225 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 11.2143820225 161% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.