People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

The author is stating that people whose make their decisions based upon their emotions and after making these decisions try to justify these decisions based upon logic are poor decisions makers. I do neither completely agree nor completely disagree with this assertion.

I believe that the wether a person is a good or poor decision maker doesn't depend upon wether the decision was based upon emotion or logic. What matters is the final result. If final result is successful the person is a good decision maker.

While it can be seen that when emotional liking or disliking takes over a person makes few decisions which are later needed to be justified by himself just to not feel guilty. Take for example when a person is following a strict diet and looses his control seeing a savory dish and eats it and later feels guilty for loosing his self control but at the same time tries to justify by saying that eating junk food sometimes is fine.

As opposed to this most of the scientific discoveries are based upon on the researchers' intuition or emotion which they later try to prove by logic. In this case if the decision succeeds he maybe considered a nice decision maker.

Although in some cases when decisions are taken based upon logic but the end result is not good, the person is still considered a poor decision maker.

For the conclusion I would like to state that wether there are some situations where emotional decisions are much nice decisions and some cases not finally it depends upon only the end result.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-03 Aishwarya01 50 view
2023-10-09 Truss 50 view
2023-10-04 Adesina Boluwatito 50 view
2023-10-01 shamika@25 50 view
2023-09-14 RIYA MODI 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user light_988888 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...person is a good or poor decision maker doesnt depend upon wether the decision was bas...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ogic. What matters is the final result. If final result is successful the person i...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...tific discoveries are based upon on the researchers intuition or emotion which they later t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...still considered a poor decision maker. For the conclusion I would like to state...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77443609023 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34596105451 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533834586466 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8005673697 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478207215058 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197004129062 0.0831039109588 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153450777919 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278328490623 0.150359130593 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117032568872 0.0667264976115 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.