A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
The justice system is a very complex and byzantine domain. One cannot decide a universal punishment for all criminals and outlaws. Every crime differs from another and thus, every punishment must be different and relevant to the crime that has been committed.The issue suggests that a person who knowingly commits a crime should not be allowed to retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from their own labor. I disagree with this issue because I feel that a criminal's punishment must be decided based on the nature and degree of the crime they commit. Generalising a punishment for all types of criminals fails to understand the nuances that exist in the complex criminal justice system.
Civil rights and rights to benefit from labor are universal rights and no one must have the power to snatch these rights away from another human being. This is the whole reason a consitituion exists in most countries. Snatching civil rights from criminals is dehumanising them and belittling there existance as humans. Most criminals, must be given a punishment that teaches them instead of torturing them. However, some criminals do deserve the strictest punishment and must pay for their crimes in the harshest manner. Thus, every punishment must be appropriate from the crime committed. But, no one should have their civil rights taken away from them. For instance, a pauper who has no food, and just to survive steals a sandwich from a super market isn't the same as a serial killer. Both have committed the crime knowingly, but there exists a great degree of difference between them and they do not deserve the same punishment. According to the issue, the pauper should have his or her civil rights and labor benefits taken away, just because he or she tried to survive. This is unfair and inhumane. Similarly, a serial killer is a horrible human and has caused great pain to people, but the right punishment isn't to take his or her civil rights away. The serial killer, however egregious, must have all his rights to defend himself and all civil rights. The serial killer must be given the strictest punishement, but must not be dehumanised.
I believe that criminals must pay for their crimes, but in a way that they can learn and never commit the crime again. Jails should be rehabilitation centres instead of tourture hubs. Every criminal must be treated as a human and be taught to be responsible for their actions. If we dehumanise criminals by taking their rights away, we are not helping them or ourselves. Instead of teaching them, we are angering them and stripping them of their rights that define them as humans. This will have adverse effects on them and they will like commit another crime again. Anger and hatred will build up and cause them to commit a greater degree of crime.
Thus, I believe that a person who commits a crime, whatever the degree of the crime is, must be able to retain his or her civil rights or right to benefit from labor. The criminal must pay for the crime, but in a way that does not dehumanise him or her. Everybody deserves to have civil rights as that is what defines us as humans. We must teach instead of tortur
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 66
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 66
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor 50
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 50
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...nt to the crime that has been committed.The issue suggests that a person who knowin...
^^^
Line 1, column 467, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'criminals'' or 'criminal's'?
Suggestion: criminals'; criminal's
...e with this issue because I feel that a criminals punishment must be decided based on the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...e steals a sandwich from a super market isnt the same as a serial killer. Both have ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ain to people, but the right punishment isnt to take his or her civil rights away. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, thus, for instance, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2620.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7723132969 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47567855545 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404371584699 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5075137364 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.96666666667 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 5.13820224719 428% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35451206801 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10001048023 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128444675469 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261566419248 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106142717591 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.