Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Though the contention between two group one believing in yielding to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise while other believing in remaining committed consistently to particular principles to become effective leader is not easily resolvable task, my opinion will go with second group. I strongly believe that effectiveness of any job including the job of a political leader also inherits in being principled for two reasons.
To begin, commitment to principle and definite objective is inevitable for any human being regardless their position, profession and activities. If that particular person is a political leader, then it’s necessity demands more. For instance, a political leader manages the entire country and the country composed of citizen with varying values and charactestics. All does not hold the opinion that are noble and contributing for the wellbeing of a country. While political leader’s opinion matters and most of the decisions for the welfare of the country depend on that. Moreover, the whole world is a global country and connected to each other. If a leader yields to public opinion and compromise with his principle, he will be no longer worthy of his position and his activities will not do any good. On the contrary it will defame the country and worsen the inter countries relation.
Secondly effectiveness is very relative term and one political leader may not be always in the throne. Sometimes he may not yield to public opinion and compromise and become ineffective in the eyes of public but after the ending his term the same leader might be celebrated for his previous activities. USA’s former president Barak Obama gave the legality of Gay marriage and it was against the most public opinion but the president was committed to his principle as leader for all both minority and majority. That time he was ridiculed and public protested against him. But now the former president is world widely celebrated.
While sometimes a leader need to yield the public and that yielding may shake his position of commitment and principle because that was for time requirement but at the end principle in unviolated and it brings the supreme welfare for all. So no political leader should abandon their principle for any reason.
- Claim While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self satisfaction it should really be a source of embarrassment Reason Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self motivation Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situations such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey firstborn infant monkeys prod 40
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 50
- To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here 68
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 857, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y it will defame the country and worsen the inter countries relation. Secondly effective...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as for, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15591397849 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78884084386 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481182795699 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5981730264 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.823529412 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411222805914 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128581208476 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968323426781 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275782347051 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100575146621 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.