Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above

Morality, by definition, is simply an inherent embodiment of values that dictate what is right or wrong . Logical reasoning, on the other hand, is the ability to carefully discern right from wrong. In the quest to produce a moral society, some might argue that education should be fundamentally based on teaching morality. Others, however, might opine that the likelihood of producing a moral society will be higher if education is based upon a foundation of teaching logical reasoning. Although morality has a place in producing a moral society, the production of a moral society is in the province of education that is fundamentally based on logical reasoning.
Education that is based on logical reasoning equips the educated one with the ability to confront situations outside the confines of the educational environment. Students who are educated in an educational system that is founded on morality often turn out to be rigid in their approach to issues. Many of these students do not necessary have an understanding of the underlying logic behind the characterization of certain values as "right" and "wrong". However, students that come from an educational background that is based on logical reasoning are equipped with the ability to discern right from wrong. Compared to their counterparts that are educated based on only morals, they are able to better confront situations to which they might not have been exposed to.
Furthermore, education that is based on logical reasoning enables the one educated in such manner a freedom from encumbrances that might otherwise be faced if such education is based on only morals. Students are able to take action and subsequently take ownership for their actions because these actions are a result of carefully thought out logical processes.
On the contrary, moral-based education might triumph over logic-based education due to the fact that the concept of "right" and "wrong" are subjective to the whims and caprices of different people. For instance in certain cultures, certain fundamental beliefs have been passed down for generations. Although unproven, these beliefs have stood the test of time because they have birthed positive results. When in a quagmire, an individual may be the better for it if he rescinds his logical reasoning for this age-long tradition.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-21 RIYA MODI 58 view
2023-09-02 jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in 50 view
2023-04-07 Aaishani De 66 view
2022-11-21 raghavchauhan619 62 view
2022-09-30 Mufaddal Rangwala 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user SulaimanIbi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lues that dictate what is right or wrong . Logical reasoning, on the other hand, i...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...enables the one educated in such manner a freedom from encumbrances that might otherwise ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39189189189 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1689195988 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47027027027 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4365630388 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.6875 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209909711662 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823493378514 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791924525306 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134461025299 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856015558584 0.0667264976115 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.