The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.

The given charts illustrate the number of male and female students who attended four evening courses in 2009, drama, painting, sculpture, and language. They also give proportions of the attendances based on age groups.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that women participated in larger proportion to 3 out of 4 courses, with the most populated course being language. Men, on the other hand, preferred painting. While the sculpture course was preferred mostly by male attendants, it resulted to be the least preferred among all. When considering the age, the majority of students were senior citizens, aged 50 or above, and the young people aged under 20 accounted for 5% of the total.
In the language course, the number of women participants reached 40, doubled that of men's. The same trend is visible in the drama course, where female were 20 and male 10 in total. A difference of only 5 people can be noticed in the painting group and sculpture group, which, in particular, was attended by 10 men, half the number of women.
Based on the age group, it is obvious that the largest proportion is taken by people aged 50 or older, who accounted for 42% of the total. The second-largest age group is that of 40 to 49 years old, representing 26%, with a minimum difference from the 30-39 and 20-29 groups, that together combined for 27% of the total. The youngsters were, in contrast, only 5% of all the students.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while, in contrast, in particular, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78367346939 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68769854124 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2347436162 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180958180694 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649732347007 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543946147029 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120544698357 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740429096954 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.