The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who are able to read and write in the different regions of the world and the world average in 2004.
The chart illustrates the proportion of individuals who can write and read in some regions around the world and the world average in only 2004.
In general, what stands out from the group is that the proportions of men who are able to read and write in all seven regions and the world average were higher than the figure for women. It is also clear to see that both men and women in the region 6 registered the highest percentages.
Looking at the graph, the percentage of men who can read and write in the region 6 was the highest, at around 70% of total people. By contrast, the figure for the region 1 was recorded the lowest, at well under 50%. The three number of men in the region 5,6,7 were higher than that of the average world which was at 65%.
About the women, the lowest number of people who can read and write was in the region 2, under 40%. Compared with the average world, the only figure for the region 6 was higher than that, at 63% and 59% respectively.
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to the university Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past What are causes and solutions 67
- The maps below show the Hogwards Grammar School in 2004 and in 2010 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3097826087 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19182161554 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467391304348 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4853960939 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361529738555 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177487887941 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121475878105 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269619635027 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102143108741 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.