The bar chart shows the number of students who choose certain university subjects in 2005.
The bar chart shows the number of students who choose certain university subjects in 2005. Most males prefer natural subjects to social studies, so the sciences of males ratio are more than 20,000 students, and the females only accounted for 10,000 people. Accordingly, in mathematics, the proportion of males is also 13-15,000 people more than females. Next, we can see that females occupy a fairly high position in social sciences and languages. In social sciences, females are worth a lot nearly 25,000 students, while men only account for nearly 15,000. Males choose language subjects in the smallest proportion of all subjects (almost 3,000 persons), whereas females choose this subject in the highest proportion (nearly 20,000 people). Humanities have equal proportions of men and women. As for the Art, males stood at 3,000 and females are higher with 9,000. Literature and Law both have a higher percentage of males than females. In detail, in Literature, there is a 4,000-person disparity between males and females. As for Law, the number of men reached 10,000, twice as many as women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | Ayu Maulida | view | |
| 2022-05-24 | BaoNganB2109248 | view | |
| 2022-03-26 | VoNguyenBaoNgocB2102351 | 91 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | Bùi Thị Xuân Thảo | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | Vũ Hải Đăng | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of carbohydrates protein fat of three different diets average diet healthy diet for sport and healthy diet 73
- To what extent do you agree with the statement English should not be taught in class Students can learn English with resources online by themselves 56
- The bar chart shows the number of students who choose certain university subjects in 2005 56
- Review Book 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16384180791 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58007203023 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570621468927 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0378237161 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193733085502 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112119163282 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.284190951056 0.0843802449381 337% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193733085502 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.