The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates how many people who live in Britain donating money to charity by 5 different ages in the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of British people gave money to charity in 1990 was higher than in 2010 except for people who were over 50 years old. Moreover, elder people tended to give money more to charity than younger people.
In 1990, the percentage of people who were 36-50 years old donated for charity was highest, accounted for approximately 42%, while the opposite was true for the 18-25s. 20 năm sau, the rate of British people giving money plummeted to 35% and 7%, respectively. A similar trend was experienced for 26-35s, at 31% in 1990 and 24% in 2010.
In contrast with the age under 50, the proportion of people who aged over 50 giving money to charity saw an upward trend over the period of 20 years. Between 1990 and 2010, a sharp rise was witnessed in the figure for the 51-65 age-group, from 35% to 39%, which was the highest percentage in 2010. This was followed by the figure for over 65 years old, stood at 35% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 67
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
..., at 31% in 1990 and 24% in 2010. In contrast with the age under 50, the proportion o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3148218074 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8359727561 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433437843114 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19625691247 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529546042867 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298134811197 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363628968608 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.