The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The chart gives information about the behaviour of citizens in USA who ate in fast food restaurant between 2003 to 2013. Overall many people in the USA who eat in fast food in 2013 in once a week or a month is about 32% of people have the same amount in 2006 who ate in fast food rastaurant once a week.
People who like to eat fast food in restaurant for several times a week is in 2006 has the highest number with 20% of people. Moreover, people who ate fast food in restaurant for once a week still in 2006 is the highest percentage about 32% of people followed by 2003 and 2013 which is got about 31% and 28% of people respectively. Next, the data shows that in 2013 people who ate fast food once or twice a month has the percentage around 33% of people while 2003 got 30% and 2006 just 25% of population. In 2006 and 2013 has the same number for people who ate fast food in restaurant just a few times a year 15% and 2003 has 13% of people.
Meanwhile, just a few people in America who eat fast food in restaurant during 2003 until 2013, this percentage have a exact number to people who never ate fast food in restaurant.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and give your own opin 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a year 15% and 2003 has 13% of people. Meanwhile, just a few people in America ...
^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g 2003 until 2013, this percentage have a exact number to people who never ate fa...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.16894977169 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25802664902 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.37899543379 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4791665214 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44086898091 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.281870852251 0.103423049105 273% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834616062014 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353468448888 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437042178875 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.5 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.