The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart illustrates the frequency of fast food consumption of US residents within a ten-year interval, from 2003 to 2013.

Overall, the majority of US customers had a tendency to eat processed food on a monthly basis while only a minority of them hardly ate any junk food within the given period.

To begin with, it is recorded that just under 5% of US consumers either had their meal at fast food restaurants daily or never tasted fast food in the given decade, occupying the smallest portions in comparison with other counterparts. This figure was three times lower than that of those who rarely tried fast food. In addition, the proportions of US people who sometimes ate fast food in 2003 and 2013 shared a similar number (about 16%), followed by that in 2006 with the figure standing at almost 20%.

Turning to the other part of data, there was a slight rise of just about 3% in the percentage of US residents, who consumed processed food on a weekly basis from 2003 to 2006. This figure then dropped to approximately 27% in 2013. On the other hand, despite witnessing a noticeable decline of 5% in the first three years, the proportion of consumers in the US who purchased fast food once or twice a month climbed significantly to 33%, becoming one of the largest share within the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-15 Zahid6400 56 view
2024-02-19 MinyiChu 56 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 67 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 56 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 56 view
Essays by user trikhung777 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68398268398 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60013564725 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5670995671 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6199998095 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174042571757 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827308760591 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421476475641 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112359944447 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460188967433 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68398268398 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60013564725 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5670995671 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6199998095 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174042571757 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827308760591 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421476475641 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112359944447 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460188967433 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.