Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative
development?
The technological advancement, such as smartphones, and the internet currently play a crucial role in the way that the majority of teenagers schedule their daily life. In this essay, I will explore closely the reasons behind this circumstance and evaluate whether it is potentially threatening development in terms of the ability of time-management of children.
To commence, the introduction of smartphones has been paving a way for a novel interactive method, bringing people closer than ever before. Furthermore, given the strong support of the internet and various social media platforms, by their convenient smartphone, today’s children have access to various types of information, categorizing from educational areas to the entertainment industry, which obtains more captivating visuals and attracting animations compared to older generation’s paper-based methods. As a result, 24-hour per day may seem to be not enough for children to discover the allure of what is happening on their smartphones which is driven by their inquisitiveness.
Along with their undeniable advantages, over-using technologies and smartphones also should be put on the table due to the disadvantages it carries. It drags not only physical health, such as optical problems, but it also brings mental issues, such as unconsciousness and time-wasting unless that child does not acquire the ability of time-management or without their parent’s supervision. Furthermore, smartphones eliminate children’s ability of imagination and critical thinking, which play a significant role during their upbringing process, due to the ready availability of various information spreading before their eyes without any effort.
In conclusion, while smartphones and other technological devices can positively support children in the way that they grow up, it can be more helpful if those teenagers are under the control of their parents, which can minimize the potential drawbacks driven by over-using smartphone circumstances.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting t 84
- Some people think the manufacturers or shopping malls should sell less packaged products and others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Many people aspire to a balance between work and other parts of their lives but few achieve it What are the problems in trying to achieve this and how can these problems be overcome 89
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83959044369 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43809861398 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621160409556 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1269824043 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.111111111 106.682146367 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196019315475 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778368114328 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551985594202 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113846241933 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242028040978 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.0946893788 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.