The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010.
The change in the population of an Asian nation passing the driving test by two genders from 1980 to 2010 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the rate of women passing to test-drive was higher than that of men in that country. Furthermore, both sexes experienced an upward trend.
As per data, there were almost a half of females who passed driving test in 1990, while males only accounted for about a quarter. A decade later, the figure for the former showed a slight increase to around 52%, and that for the latter inclined significantly to reach two fifths.
In 2000, the proportion of females to pass the test became the maximum data recorded, inclining to seven in ten closely. Although it decreased ten years later to be three fifths, this figure was still bigger than the counterpart. When it came to the figure for men, this witnessed a significant growth to mostly a half, then it remained stable eventually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-04 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-18 | tsln7607 | 82 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Tran Hoang Bao | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ta minh anh | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | ta minh anh | view |
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007
- News media is more influential nowadays Some people think it is a negative development To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000 84
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7743902439 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5942309469 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664634146341 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0682213041 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229700299882 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914184694666 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856585992995 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141380257753 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627132272724 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.