The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the worth in billion dollars of a country’s export in five areas during the years 2015 and 2016. The table depicts the percentage increase or decrease in those five categories from 2015 to 2016.
Overall, all categories had a growth in their export except Gems and jewellery which saw a fall from 2015 to 2016. Highest percentage change was recorded for textiles. Petroleum has the highest earning during the year 2015 whereas engineering goods and petroleum products had around the same value during the year 2016 which was recorded as the highest.
For petroleum products, the export earning has risen from around 61 billion dollars to about 63 billion dollars with a percentage increase of 3%. For agricultural products, there is a minimal increase in exports from 2015 to 2016 with only 0.81% rise. Engineering goods and textiles saw a significant rise from 2015 when the values were about 58 billion dollars and 26 billion dollars to nearly 61 billion dollars and 31 billion dollars in 2016. These categories had 8.5% and 15.24% increase respectively.
The only category observed to have a decrease in exports is gems and jewellery. In 2015, the value of exports was around 42 billion dollars whereas in 2016, the value was about 40.5 billion dollars. This showed a 5.18% fall in export earnings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
The chart illustrates the worth in billion dollars of a country’s export in five a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
...ery which saw a fall from 2015 to 2016. Highest percentage change was recorded for text...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04977375566 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55877451934 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457013574661 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9966031354 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41666666667 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323197604188 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145083141366 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670268897466 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240086697246 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745715033344 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.