Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent years, the trasport system has been changed towards their means of ways. People thought that governing bodies need to change their attentions from roads to inter-country railway network. I storngly agree with this statement and in the course of the essay, I will describe arguments.
Firstly, railway system develop for each cetagories of communities which can travel on it and it is cheaper then any other mood of transportation. Individuals to family can travel togather and it can create more conection between peoples because in train large number of people sit togather from different school of thought. For example, India had almost each religion, if people can use train to get their destination, between their journay the can learn about others society. Due to this it would develop tolerance to listen others point of view. In addition, they are able to save money because if they travel by private car that cost more and not so good for environment.
Secondly, these days carbon emission is a major danger to global warming. On road people travel by own vehical which burn fossil fuels and exhusat green house gases which is main reason behind the increase of earth temperature. However, if government make more railway lines which create less pollution. For instence, 2000 people tarvel by own vehicals by using around 1000 cars that produce significant amount of carbon in comparison of rail.
In conclusion, travelling by rail is much cheaper then other ways of transportation, however it gives chance to konw about others. It also better for environment and longterm pollution problems.
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss Both views and give your opinion 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheaper than'?
Suggestion: cheaper than
...nities which can travel on it and it is cheaper then any other mood of transportation. Indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
... each religion, if people can use train to get their destination, between their journa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lution. For instence, 2000 people tarvel by own vehicals by using around 1000 ca...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people tarvel by own vehicals by using around 1000 cars that produce significan...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheaper than'?
Suggestion: cheaper than
... conclusion, travelling by rail is much cheaper then other ways of transportation, however i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ion, travelling by rail is much cheaper then other ways of transportation, however i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...es chance to konw about others. It also better for environment and longterm pollution ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13688212928 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65262474703 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6463878327 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0673972288 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0942459561059 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362643108905 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527444206639 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605646307585 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619535114445 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.