The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian Countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
The illustrated line graph depicts the percentage of total population residing in cities of Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia in the past 50 years and its future prediction till 2040.
Overall, all cities had an increasing trend in total population with Malaysia and Indonesia increasing in an alarming rate. Philippines had the highest population during the initial year which will be overtaken by all other countries except Thailand.
Malaysia had second position in number of population in the year 1970, which had a slight dip only in the year 1990 and the remaining trends was and will be upward reaching at the peak of 80 percent in the future. Indonesia being the least populated city also had a similar trend with gradual increase surpassing Thailand in 2000 and Philippines after 10 year, and is predicted to withhold around 60 % of population in 2040.
Philippines initially had the highest population which had mere change for a decade, followed by swift recovery to around 50 percent. Population then fell gradually until 2010 and is predicted to increase with the same pace reaching the second highest position in 2040. Likewise, Thailand had gradual increase until 1990 which then had slight shift till 2020. However, it will recover to around 40 Percent at the ending year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 11
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18396226415 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68898122472 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3801079558 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.111111111 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167736093444 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799863714289 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552254212163 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121039770355 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317390111967 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.