The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The graphs illustrate the sales of Fairtrade- labeled coffee and bananas in five different European countries via the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in 1999 and 2004. Overall, there was a significant increase in the sales of coffee while another graph shows a gently decrease in Sweden and Denmark in this two different years.
To begin with, in the sales of coffee, Denmark occupied the highest amount of money at 1,8 million euros in 1999 while the United Kingdom made up 20 million euros and topped the list in 2000. In both years, Sweden accounted for the lowest sales of coffee. It is also interesting to note that, there was a similar upward trend can be observed in all five countries. Especially, the sale in the United Kingdom in 2004 was thirteen times that of 1999. In contrast, Denmark and Sweden show a slight increase from 1,8 to 2 and 0,8 to 1 respectively. Whereas, the sales in Switzerland halved in 1999 compared to 2004.
When we compared the sales between these countries, we can see that Switzerland made up the highest sales in both years. While the United Kingdom occupied the lowest sales at 1 million euros in 1999, Denmark accounted for just only 0,9 in 2004. Except for Sweden and Denmark, all other countries show a similar upward trend. There was a three times increase in Switzerland, followed by a six times went up in the United Kingdom and Belgium from 1 to 5,5 and 0,6 to 6 respectively. In contrast, the other two countries' sales halved in 1999 and 2004.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree with these views? 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...les of coffee while another graph shows a gently decrease in Sweden and Denmark in this two diffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rom 1,8 to 2 and 0,8 to 1 respectively. Whereas, the sales in Switzerland halved in 199...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, except for, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72830188679 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5669920534 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449056603774 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2938012413 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3846153846 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231779800043 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990435538568 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937630016921 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186798136952 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552399857682 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.