The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK.
The graph provides information about the accessibility of UK citizens to four types of modern technologies from the year 1994 to 2008, measured by percentage.
Both CD player and mobile phone followed a marginal upward trend. The former showed up in the UK earlier with around 43% in 1994/95 then it slowly raised and ended up at about 82% by the year 2008. Likewise, the latter, which was first accessed about 2 years later with approximately 10%, steadily increased and hit its peak at around 62% in the final year.
Regarding the DVD player figure, it underwent a wild fluctuation but with an upward trend. In 1996/97 the proportion was just under 20% then reached its peak at 78% by 2002/03 and 2008. The internet connection was the most noticeable. As the latest technology accessed in the UK, its proportion went up dramatically from about 25% to 80% between the year 2002 and 2004/05. From this point, the figure slowed down and winded up at around 82% in 2008, where it exceeded the CD player figure.
Overall, UK households, on average, by 2008 can access more than 60% to four types of technologies with the most outstanding was the internet connection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | Nguyên-MTTN | view | |
| 2023-08-22 | Vinty | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Phan Quang Tuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | ducmap03 | 11 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
- some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts below show how selected age groups bought concert cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2013 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed 84
- Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem Do you agree 89
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, likewise, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83582089552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68673299654 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4498331104 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150704103289 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060175065089 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077937060182 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121708800809 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074241939812 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.