The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates the percentage of recycled material for paper and cardboard, glass containers, alumininium cans, and plastics in a specific country for the 28-year time span.
Over all, the most noticeable trend is that the recycling percentage of all items increased throughout the period, but some of them rose incrementally, and the others fluctuated.
To begin with the two highest proportions, from 1982 to 1990, paper and cupboards started at 65%, then rose by 5% before turning back again to the original heading point, while glass containers began at 50%, and after that, it had a dramatic decrease by 10%. Afterwords, for the following 5 years, paper and cardboard boosted from 65% up to 80%, and 10% growth rate for glass containers. From 1994 until the end of the period, paper and cardboard had a tendency towards declination from 80% to 70%. In contrast, glass containers rose by the same margin.
Regarding the lowest two materials, alumininium cans appeared in 1986, and achieved an approximate rise of 45% by the end of the time frame. Lately, plastics were recycled by a limited portion that did not exceed 10% during the reported years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fic country for the 28-year time span. Over all, the most noticeable trend is t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rementally, and the others fluctuated. To begin with the two highest proportion...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss containers rose by the same margin. Regarding the lowest two materials, alum...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exceed 10% during the reported years.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, then, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08762886598 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77228072893 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639175257732 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2278659664 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10059142487 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424606819458 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367762993933 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592000030964 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258158683652 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.