The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. \
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts illustrate the average household spending in Japan and Malaysia during the year 2010.
Overall, the three categories including housing, food and other goods and services was the highest commonly spent . The figure for spending on transport and healthcare in Malaysia was doubled in Japan.
It is evident that other goods and services was accounted for the highest spending of householder in Japan, which was represented 29% in the total expenditure. Whereas It was slightly higher than in Malaysia, Malaysia householders spent the highest proportion of their income on housing. It was much higher than in Japan - at 21%. In terms of food, the percetage of spending on this category in both Japan and Malaysia were 24% and 27% respectively.
While the percentage of expenditure on transport in Malaysia was 10%, this figure in Japan was twofold. The proportion of heathcare saw a similar trend, which was 3% and 6% respectively in Malaysia and Japan
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-05 | nhinhi999 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Sarina2021 | 40 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Sarina2021 | view | |
| 2022-03-27 | Ahmed Z | 81 | view |
| 2022-01-20 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information about household car ownership in Britain from 1990 to 2030 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... services was the highest commonly spent . The figure for spending on transport an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1835443038 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83156731114 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8767013566 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177058266374 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947719062666 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092934809055 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152120271533 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114471291425 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.