The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The plans compare how the Corange Park opened 1920 and the same one in present day. As can be seen from the plans, there was an almost complete transformation of the infrastructures and the park's segments. Moreover, the park has been turned into a more multifunctional area.
In particular, it is obvious that the fountain in the middle the park was removed to make way for the relocation of the rose garden, which was once situated in the left corner of the park in 1920. It is now surrounded by the seats in four different directions, unlike the past when they were scattered widel in several parts of the park. Moreover, the stage for musicians, which was once at the left adjacent area of the fountain,was demolished to build bigger amphitheatre for concerts. Similarly, a new children's play area and a coffee shop were erected in place of the of pond and rose garden respectively.
Interestingly, while almost all the features went through significant changes, the two entrances facing the street Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street as well as the rose garden in the north-east stay the same. Additionally, a new entrance is constructed as an underground a car park, just right below a new built water feature at the right corner of the plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , was
...t the left adjacent area of the fountain,was demolished to build bigger amphitheatre...
^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... north-east stay the same. Additionally, a new entrance is constructed as an unde...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, well, while, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89814099047 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609302325581 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9676881182 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254263381948 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10536735611 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953675759967 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172025017079 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794875242329 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.