The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables illustrate the revenues from selling Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five different European countries.
As can be seen from the tables, there was an upward trend in the sales of the surveyed items in all five nations. Moreover, bananas' earnings were higher than coffee's in general.
In particular, the UK recorded 4.5 million of euros sales from coffee in 1999, before the figure soared to 20 million in 2004, which was also the highest number in the table. Switzerland also experienced significant growth in sales when the 2004's number doubled at 6 million of euros. Denmark and Sweden were the two nations with the slightest rise, of only 0.2 million each.
Turning to bananas, Switzerland topped the the table with 47 million of euro in 2004, which was over three times the number in 1999. The similar increase was witnessed in the UK and Belgium, at 4.5 million and 3.4 million respectively. By contrast, the bananas' sales in Sweden and Denmark went down between 1999 and 2004, both under a million in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... Turning to bananas, Switzerland topped the the table with 47 million of euro in 2004, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... Turning to bananas, Switzerland topped the the table with 47 million of euro in 2004, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45336218065 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8779409937 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266986774506 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118760515549 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125434012703 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199749606471 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135720721329 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.