The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables compare sales of Fairtrade coffee and bananas in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden in the years 1999 and 2004.
It is clear that the UK had the highest sales of Fairtrade bananas in both years and saw a dramatic increase in turnover of Fairtrade coffee in 2004. While all five countries rose sales of coffee, only three out of five countries increased revenues of bananas.
In 1999, sales of Fairtrade coffee in the UK and Switzerland were 1.5 and 3 million euros. Over the following five years, these figures increased to 20 and 6 million euros, while sales of Fairtrade coffee in Denmark, Belgium and Sweden rose slightly to 2 million euros or lower in 2004.
In the year 1999, sales of Fairtrade bananas in the UK were the biggest and more than figures for all four other European countries combined, at 15 million euros. In the same year, revenues of bananas in Switzerland and Denmark were 1 and 0.6 million euros respectively. By 2004, sales figure for the UK had risen to 47 million euros, and sales of Switzerland and Denmark were 5.5 and 4 million euros. It is noticeable that Belgium and Sweden saw slight falls in sales to 1 million euros or lower in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a honey bee 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles would be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66037735849 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49887835287 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433962264151 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4434628822 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314455074796 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168216146855 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808483161724 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2491968701 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596935450789 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.