Write a letter to the local council about the closure of a playground in your area because children don’t use it much. In your letter say
– Why don’t many children use it?
– How is the playground important for children?
– Give some suggestions how to increase the playground’s usage.
Dear Sir/ Madam,
This is Sri from Mandaveli, Chennai and I am writing this letter in regards to the closure of the playground in the 2nd cross street which is a residential area. From one of the newspapers, I came to know that local council in every areas are involved in shutting down the un-used playgrounds in the city. Kindly note that one of the old playground in my area is not much used by the kids, however, I would like to suggest that it requires new changes to re-open the ground that attracts childern instead of closing down.
There are multiple reasons for the children to not using the playground effectively. In my area, one of the important reason is that there is no such equipment in the ground for the kids to use, however, the swings are broken and slides are damaged. Also note that during rainy season, there is water logging issue the place which spoils the ground. As playground play a vital role to increase the outdoor activities which leads to healthier lifestyle of the kids and also it helps to promote the social harmony among the childern.
I would like to suggest the Local Council to review the order of the closure and enchance the oppourity to give new play ground for the kids in the area. This can be done by changing the equipments in the ground like replacing the swing, slides and so on. Also it would be great if there is a space for cycling and net / wall games. It is important for the society to encourage childern to involve themselves in the outdoor activities, as it builts the healthier generation.
Hope my letter would convience you to re-think on the closure of the playgrounds and awaiting for the positive reponse or action on this letter.
Thanking you.
Regards,
Nalli Sri
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...i, Chennai and I am writing this letter in regards to the closure of the playground in the 2n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ings are broken and slides are damaged. Also note that during rainy season, there is...
^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'notes'.
Suggestion: notes
...are broken and slides are damaged. Also note that during rainy season, there is wate...
^^^^
Line 13, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... replacing the swing, slides and so on. Also it would be great if there is a space f...
^^^^
Line 17, column 86, Rule ID: AWAITING_FOR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'awaiting' or 'waiting for'?
Suggestion: awaiting; waiting for
...k on the closure of the playgrounds and awaiting for the positive reponse or action on this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 937.175257732 155% => OK
No of words: 309.0 206.0 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70226537217 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47199506986 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 127.690721649 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511326860841 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 290.88556701 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7378399602 44.8134815571 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 76.5299724578 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 16.8248392259 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61538461538 4.34317383033 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237854532591 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792143926806 0.0766984524023 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769498108632 0.0603063233224 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146283473089 0.12726935374 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361848522963 0.0580467560999 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 8.37731958763 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 8.71597938144 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 41.2886597938 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 8.62886597938 203% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.