The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
One of the best ways to address the global environmental problem, according to conventional wisdom, is to increase the price of gasoline. From my perspective, I am in complete agreement with this viewpoint for the following reasons.
The first reason is that an increase in fuel prices could address the issue of pollution. In other words, when the cost of fuel is expanded, people tend to be resisted commuting by their private vehicles such as cars and motorbikes; instead, they are encouraged to carpool or utilize public transport systems. That means, emissions from private vehicles in megacities would be diminished. Take Hanoi as an illustration of the strong connection between pollution and petrol fee extension. Reportedly, a study from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment records that the rate of pollution in Hanoi has halved since the government tripled the price of fuel. What can be inferred from this is that the escalation of fuels would be efficient in decontaminating pollution in megacities.
Another justification is that increasing fuel costs may help mankind save the natural resources. To be more specific, if the expense of fuel is raised, fewer people will use their vehicles, which means fewer raw materials being exploited. Recent research suggests that non-renewable resources are strongly associated with fuel price increases. Accordingly, a study in a city in Russia reports that since the price of fuel soared due to the Russia-Ukraine war, this country has not exploited natural deposits for several months. This directly suggests that increasing fuel prices encourage people to conserve natural resources, which are on the edge of depleting.
In conclusion, the price of petrol should be increased for the benefit of not only pollution in megacities but also the natural resources.
- A study shows that a lot of children from the age 7 to 11 spend too much time watching television or playing video games How do you think this problem influences the children their families and the society What measures should be taken to solve it 67
- People have different views on how to reduce traffic congestion Some think that governments should build more train and subway lines while others think that building more roads and widening existing roads will reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below show how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to the people who use it To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37024221453 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99311358662 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4131051446 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223243288338 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081847449877 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629754819237 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142579497752 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633216507326 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37024221453 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99311358662 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4131051446 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223243288338 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081847449877 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629754819237 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142579497752 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633216507326 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.