Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?
There is a concern that outside life has burdened young generations with various pressures. In this essay, I will discuss its reasons before giving some possible actions.
Being under pressure and having responsibilities at a young age are caused by a variety of factors. When it comes to the burden of academia, the cause is more and more competition in the job market, accompanied by their parents' over-expectations. The organizations’ demands about a professional and highly educated labor force make parents think that their children must be successful in school, and those young regard studying as a duty. Furthermore, some children, especially the majority of the gifted or those who were born in families with a good reputation, seem to feel that their personal lives are of concern to the public. Appearing in front of the media at such an early age can take their innocent childhood away. Commercial pressures that they must face from fast-food store chains or bakeries turn them into targeted customers, and they are affected by the mess of advertising campaigns both online and offline.
To limit those pressures towards children, I would recommend some strong methods. First, parents should create a family environment that is suitable for physical and mental growth, including a balance between study and recreation. Sports, painting, and travel are usually inexpensive and can help children cope with the pressures of education and society. Furthermore, moral business must be emphasized and practiced by all companies. They should keep online advertisements away from children by placing an age limitation on their websites.
In conclusion, it is unfair when children must confront any pressures, and all social members should manage to bring them a happy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | panchal dhruv | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Bao Ngoc Tho | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-22 | Harman97 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
- Some people think saving money is good but others think that spending money is a better way to enjoy life Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 61
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 84
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 84
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- Some people think saving money is good but others think that spending money is a better way to enjoy life Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34042553191 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97088634684 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6444723312 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190133281918 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610666707311 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512392356081 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961119028447 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660817933511 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34042553191 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97088634684 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6444723312 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190133281918 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610666707311 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512392356081 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961119028447 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660817933511 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.