Describe some ways in which mankind is harming the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individuals do?
There is an ugly truth that human beings are devastating the environment but we can take steps towards the protection of the environment. This essay will suggest the measures that could be taken by governments and individuals to address these urgent problems.
There are numerous ways in which humans are harming the environment. People cause air pollution by making cars their main means of transportation. Consequently, the more cars are used, the more carbon dioxide is produced. Factories are also the primary polluters by producing a great amount of chemical waste. In addition, many individuals dump garbage in inappropriate places, such as the river. As a result, their reckless actions make the rivers or the lakes contaminated places to live for fish and other river inhabitants, eventually killing them.
The governments can solve these problems in many ways. One of them is to introduce various environmental laws and regulations and impose heavy punishment on those who pollute the environment. For example, they can increase the fine for the amount of industrial waste and carbon dioxide released by factories. Apart from the government, individuals can also take several actions to protect their surrounding area. Firstly, they should use public transport more than their private vehicles to reduce car fumes. Secondly, people need to use environmentally-friendly products, which have reuse and recycle characteristics. For instance, they can use paper or cloth bags while shopping instead of plastic bags. By following this step, individuals can gradually reduce their household waste.
In conclusion, people are damaging the environment but we can take responsibility for these growing issues. Governments and individuals could certainly implement a range of measures to reduce the disastrous effects we have on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | khanhuyen0115 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | minh14012000 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 67 | view |
- Food safety violations including using improved fertilizers and toxic chemicals to produce foods are increasing at an alarming rate What suggestions would you give to solve these problems 78
- Some people are convinced that games online are a waste of time while others believe that games online can actually bring benefits about lots of benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- What are the benefits of online learning Write an essay of about 250 words on this topic Make sure you support your position with relevant examples and evidence 84
- An effective health care system should encourage people to take preventative measures against illness and disease rather than encourage them to rely on treatment To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of renewable fuels 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'reused'.
Suggestion: reused
...nmentally-friendly products, which have reuse and recycle characteristics. For instan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54416961131 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20816533063 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8969225832 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19905251215 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665391748479 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669778586965 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124758689514 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437877281234 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.