Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is diminishing trend of languages in each year, which a portion of individuals assume unnecessary as lifestyle will be simple if there are countable languages in the globe. Many countries let several languages to die out in order to simplify the way of living in their nations. I completely disagree with the statement s these languages are significant for preserving the culture in their territory and also such languages stabilize language diversity and simplify the discoveries of ancient findings recognitions easy.
Many states are popular wit their cultures which in turn directly related to the language diversity. Also, language speaking as their tradition is considered as reverence for their ancestors. For example, many of the African tribes speak their native ancestral language in order to worship their elderly one or showing them a heartful respect. Not only these languages help communicate with their ancestors, but these indirectly preserve their traditional cultures. These tribes teaching such languages to their younger generations. So, I suppose opposite perspective of the given statement.
there are several ancestral findings which can be used to predict our past. In those findings there are carvings of several languages and if we are able to understand such languages, we can accurately predict our past. But the dying out of such languages during the years between today and generation of such findings make it difficult to recognize then. For instance, there are numerous carved ancestral stones in Egypt by an old language and it is assumed that if we understand such language today, we can come to the conclusions of several doubts of ancient Egypt. If such language can be understood by someone today, a great achievement will be achieved. This scenario also suggests that it is crucial to preserve al the languages rather than letting it die out.
In conclusion, although fewer languages will make the lifestyle easier, each and all languages are important to show respect towards culture and ancestors, to preserve the language diversity and to predict the past through the recognition of ancestral languages in the carved findings from the past. So, I completely disagree with the given statement.
- In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers Why has this happened what can be done to deal with this 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Because of modern technology some people believe that it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give your opinion based on your experience 73
- It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives How could robots be used in the future Will this development be a positive or a negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... perspective of the given statement. there are several ancestral findings which ca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32957746479 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84369789791 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487323943662 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1753986841 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.294117647 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267914266083 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989189468179 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537924944171 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18605782524 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611957944067 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.